top of page

Navigating the Gray Areas: Use of Force Guidelines


In the vast tapestry of human interactions, there lies a shadowed realm of ambiguity, a domain where decisions are not black or white but linger in a nebulous gray. For security officers, this territory is often encountered in the arena of the use of force. The question that perennially arises is: When is it justified? And if so, to what extent?

I've personally delved deep into the intricacies of human behaviour, ethics, and law. The use of force is not a mere act; it is a manifestation of power, control, and responsibility. Like a sword, it can protect, but it can also harm. How then does one wield this sword rightly?

At the heart of every security officer's training lies a moral compass. It serves as a guide, illuminating the path of righteousness even when shrouded in doubt. The first principle to understand is that of necessity. Do you have any other option/s? Could you tactically disengage? get behind an obstacle? a door, a table? If the answer is yes, the was it necessary? No, No it wasn't.

The next element of justification is reasonableness. Would it be reasonable for any other common man to have reasonably reacted the same way as you did? Then the third element is that of proportionality. Just as one would not use a sledgehammer to crack a nut, the force employed should be proportionate to the perceived threat. But herein lies the conundrum. How does one measure this proportionality? The world is not a static place; it's dynamic, filled with variables and unpredictabilities. The answer, although complex, resides in the synthesis of training, intuition, and empathy. By understanding the intent and capability of an individual, a security officer can gauge the appropriate response.

Beyond the realm of legality, there's an ethical dimension to consider. Every individual, regardless of their actions, is a complex tapestry of emotions, experiences, and dreams. Using force is not merely a physical act; it touches the very soul of the person on the receiving end.

Imagine, for a moment, a river. Its waters are calm, but beneath the surface, currents swirl, shaped by the landscape of the riverbed. Similarly, every individual has underlying currents shaped by their life experiences. Before resorting to force, it's paramount for security officers to understand these currents, seeking non-violent avenues of resolution whenever possible.

The legal landscape concerning the use of force is intricate. While laws and regulations provide a framework, they too exist in shades of gray. An act deemed justifiable in one context might be deemed excessive in another. It's a labyrinth that security officers must navigate with caution.

One key principle to remember is accountability. Every use of force, no matter how minor, leaves a trail. Documentation, evidence, and transparency are not mere bureaucratic procedures; they're the lifelines that tether actions to the realm of law and order.

While the use of force is sometimes inevitable, the art of de-escalation is a skill every security officer should master. It's akin to taming a wild beast, not with chains but with understanding and communication.

In my training sessions, I emphasize the importance of verbal techniques, body language, and active listening. A situation can often be diffused by merely providing an individual with a platform to be heard. By understanding their grievances, fears, and motivations, a security officer can guide the situation towards a peaceful resolution.

The aftermath of employing force often leaves an indelible mark, not just on the individual affected but on the security officer as well. It's a heavy burden to bear knowing that one's actions have physically harmed another. The psychological toll can be profound, leading to self-doubt, guilt, and, in some cases, trauma.

It's crucial for security officers to seek support, whether through counseling, peer discussions, or reflective practices. The path forward is not one of isolation but of community, understanding, and healing.

The use of force is a multi-faceted issue, lying at the crossroads of ethics, law, and human psychology. Navigating the gray areas requires a blend of training, intuition, and moral judgment. By understanding the profound implications of their actions and continuously striving for non-violent resolutions, security officers can uphold the sanctity of their profession, ensuring safety while respecting the dignity of all. From the author.


The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

2 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page