top of page

Reduced Personal Responsibility: The Impact of Government Intervention on Individual Choice

In the realm of personal security and societal safety, the role of government intervention is a topic that often ignites passionate debate. Advocates argue for the necessity of government involvement to ensure public safety, while detractors warn of the potential erosion of personal responsibility and individual freedom. My role as a security trainer is to maintain the intricate balance between government intervention and personal responsibility, particularly in the context of public safety and crowd management.

At the heart of this discussion is the concept of personal responsibility. Historically, societies have thrived when individuals are held accountable for their actions. This accountability fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility for one's actions and their consequences. However, an overreliance on governmental oversight leads to a diminishment of this vital sense of personal responsibility.

Government intervention in matters of security and crowd control is often justified on the grounds of public safety. The rationale is that without regulatory oversight, individuals may not act in the best interest of the collective, leading to chaos and disorder. This perspective, while well-intentioned, overlooks the fundamental capacity of individuals and communities to self-regulate and act responsibly.

Most crowds, contrary to popular belief, behave lawfully and orderly. The psychology behind crowd behaviour indicates that individuals in groups tend to follow social norms and rules, especially when these norms are internalized and valued. Too much government control weakens these internalized norms by moving the focus of control from the individual to the state. This makes people less likely to act responsibly when they are with other people.

One of the critical consequences of heightened government intervention is the erosion of personal choice. When individuals are constantly monitored and controlled, their ability to make independent decisions is significantly reduced. This reduction in personal choice not only impinges on individual freedom but also diminishes the individual’s ability to respond effectively to unexpected situations, a critical skill in security and crowd management.

In training security personnel, a key focus is on developing the ability to assess and respond to situations with a blend of intuition, experience, and situational awareness. Over-dependence on government directives stifles these essential skills. Security professionals need to be empowered to make swift decisions based on the specifics of a situation rather than relying solely on a set of government-imposed guidelines.

This is not to argue for the abolition of all government intervention in matters of security. Indeed, certain regulations and oversight are necessary for maintaining order and protecting the public. However, there must be a balance where government intervention does not encroach excessively on personal freedom and responsibility. Effective crowd management and security are best achieved when individuals are given the liberty to act responsibly within a framework of sensible government guidelines.

While government intervention in security and crowd control is sometimes necessary, it is crucial to maintain a balance that does not erode personal responsibility and individual choice. Societies are more resilient when individuals are empowered to make decisions and act responsibly, both as independent agents and as members of larger groups. In training security personnel, this philosophy of balancing government oversight with personal responsibility is a guiding principle, ensuring that security measures enhance, rather than diminish, the ability of individuals to act responsibly for the greater good. Its not about offering "final solutions!", its about trade. From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

7 views0 comments


bottom of page