top of page

Security Personnel: Balancing Authority and Approachability


In modern societal dynamics, the role of security personnel is pivotal yet often misunderstood. Their responsibility lies not just in the enforcement of rules and the protection of assets but also in the nuanced art of human interaction. This balance between authority and approachability is not just desirable but essential to the effective execution of their duties.

The role of security personnel extends beyond mere physical presence. It’s a blend of psychological acuity and economic rationality. The understanding of human motivation, the incentives that drive behaviour, and the deterrents that mold it, form the bedrock of effective security.

Security, at its core, is an economic problem. It involves allocating limited resources—time, attention, and manpower—to manage potential risks. The decision-making process here is not unlike that in economics: determining the most efficient allocation of resources to achieve the desired outcome, which in this case is safety and order.

Understanding human psychology is crucial for security personnel. People are complex beings with a variety of motivations. A deep comprehension of these underlying factors enables security staff to anticipate potential issues and defuse situations before they escalate.

When security personnel are managing a large, potentially volatile crowd. Here, the economic principle of ‘opportunity cost’ is at play. The security team must decide where their presence is most needed to prevent any disruptive behaviour. Psychological insights into crowd behaviour, such as the tendency for individuals to follow group actions, can guide these decisions.

In a situation involving a potentially dangerous individual, the principles of risk assessment come into play. Here, the balance between authority and approachability is most delicate. A stern approach might escalate the situation, whereas a too-lenient stance could undermine authority.

In crowd control scenarios, trainees are presented with a simulated environment where they must manage a crowd. The focus here is on quick decision-making, efficient resource allocation, and understanding group psychology.

When performing conflict resolution techniques, the scenario involves trainees interacting with actors simulating aggressive behaviour. The goal is to de-escalate the situation using communication skills, body language, and authority without resorting to physical confrontation.

The role of security personnel, often seen through a simplistic lens, is a complex interplay of economics, psychology, and human interaction. Their effectiveness lies in striking a balance between being authoritative and approachable, a balance that requires not just strength but also wisdom and insight. Security personnel are not police; they are able to use both permissive and directive methods. They have no greater power than any other person, and thus effective training is more important than equipment. From the author.


The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

8 views0 comments

Commenti


bottom of page