top of page

Accountability and Government: The Veil of Intervention


In the boogie-woogie of governance, accountability stands as the compass that guides the polity towards integrity and trust. Most claims, based on a close study of economic and psychological schools of thought, say that when the government gets involved, it often casts a shadow over this clear directive, making people less accountable by not being open and keeping an eye on things.

Accountability is the cornerstone of effective governance. It ensures that decision-makers bear the consequences of their actions, aligning their interests with those they serve. However, when government interventions amplify in complexity and scope, they bring a haze of opacity with them, clouding the accountability that should be evident in public service.

Government interventions, particularly those that swell the bureaucratic apparatus, create fiefdoms and environments where transparency and oversight are diluted. In such situations, the chain of responsibility becomes convoluted, making it difficult to pinpoint where accountability lies. This is not merely a theoretical concern but one that manifests in various sectors, from fiscal policy to public safety.

Australia, with its robust democratic traditions, is not immune from these phenomena. Consider the case of public spending, where government programs are frequently initiated with promised oversight. The lack of scrutiny of expenditures related to infrastructure projects, where cost overruns and delays are frequent, suggests that the effectiveness of this oversight is questionable.

Overregulation, a common guise for government intervention, can make this lack of accountability worse. When regulations are dense and pervasive, they obscure rather than clarify, reducing the ability of both the public and oversight bodies to monitor and evaluate government performance effectively.

The psychological dimension of this issue is significant. When individuals within a system are not held accountable, a culture of irresponsibility grows, diminishing motivation and promoting a lack of ownership. This is as true in the corridors of power as it is in the broader societal context.

In the realm of public safety and security, the consequences of reduced accountability are dire. Those of us experienced in security management stress the importance of clear lines of responsibility. However, when government interventions introduce complex layers of administration, it leads to a diffusion of accountability, compromising public safety.

The failed Territory Alliance public housing scheme is a well-known example. As a government initiative, it faced criticism for its administration, accountability, and transparency. The convolutions of oversight and the lack of clear accountability mechanisms led to public concerns over the stewardship of taxpayer funds. The Federal Government's intervention failures of the day silenced the significant shortfall in houses promised and completed.

Effective oversight mechanisms are the antidote to the accountability erosion that can accompany government interventions. These mechanisms must be robust, independent, and empowered to cut through the bureaucratic red tape that can shroud government actions in mystery.

The issue of reduced accountability in the wake of government intervention is a critical one, with tangible implications for governance. Australia's experiences serve as illustrative examples of the challenges posed. A vigilant public, empowered oversight bodies, and a commitment to transparency can ensure that accountability is not a casualty of government intervention. However, the failed ICAC experiment provides clear guidelines for the appointee's powers, funding, and employment to be at arm's length from the local officials. It is within this framework that a government can serve its people with integrity, ensuring that the trust placed in public institutions is not misplaced. From the author.


The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

7 views0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page