top of page
  • Writer's pictureSam Wilks

Assessing the Impact of Entitlement Programs in the Northern Territory

Entitlement programs are designed with the noble intention of supporting the less fortunate in society. However, when poorly implemented or managed, these programs lead to unintended consequences, including increased crime, systemic injustice, and economic inefficiency. This is particularly evident in the Northern Territory of Australia, where a mix of well-meaning policies and entitlement programs has, paradoxically, contributed to societal and economic challenges that have burdened the entire country.

According to several legal and economic theorists, entitlement programs should be based on the principle of fairness. The idea is to redistribute resources to ensure a more equitable society. Many social theories in my lifetime have been repeatedly discredited; unfortunately, when virtue signalling and social credit scores are used to incentivise bad behaviour and failed policies, they are seldom removed. For example, in the Northern Territory, this redistribution has fueled a cycle of dependency and crime. For instance, in many communities, there is a noticeable increase in petty crimes and anti-social behaviour, coinciding with the disbursement dates of welfare payments. This correlation suggests that the availability of easy money, rather than alleviating poverty, fosters a sense of entitlement and complacency.

Real-world examples abound. In Alice Springs and other towns, there is consistent reporting and recorded incidents of increased vandalism, theft, and public disturbances following the release of welfare funds. This trend points to a deeper issue: the erosion of personal responsibility and the fostering of a mindset that looks to external sources for sustenance and survival.

According to many contemporary activist judges and various judicial philosophers in the NT, the concept of justice encompasses not only the fairness of systems and processes but also the equitable distribution of resources. In the Northern Territory, the implementation of entitlement programs has predictably led to perverse outcomes that exacerbate injustice rather than alleviate it.

For example, the allocation of housing and benefits based on need has, in some cases, led to situations where those who are marginally better off are significantly disadvantaged, creating a disincentive to improve one’s economic situation. This not only perpetuates economic disparities but also fosters a sense of injustice among those who feel penalised for their relative success.

Moreover, the criminal justice system, in attempting to be sensitive to the socioeconomic backgrounds of offenders, has inadvertently created a two-tiered system of justice. This results in leniency for crimes under the guise of understanding the underlying social causes, thus eroding the principle of equality before the law.

In considering the wisdom of seeking counsel from judges, magistrates, or lawyers on matters where their financial gain is intertwined with the failure of these issues, one might draw a stark, albeit provocative, analogy. It would seem as imprudent as entrusting a paedophile with the design and oversight of a childcare facility. The underlying principle here is the conflict of interest that skews judgement and objectivity. Legal professionals succumb, even unconsciously, to the lure of financial gain, just as the paedophile's innate tendencies are alarmingly out of alignment with the safety and well-being of children. This creates a situation where their guidance leads to outcomes that, while profitable for them, are detrimental to the broader context of justice and fairness.

Economic theories warn against the inefficiencies and unintended consequences of market interventions. In the Northern Territory, entitlement programs have led to significant economic waste. Funds that could have been used for productive investments in the economy are instead channelled into maintaining systems that fail to achieve their intended objectives. Every call for auditing, accountability, or key performance indicators, is met with resistance from those profiting from the pain of others.


The impact of such economic inefficiency is not just in terms of lost opportunities but also in the perpetuation of the very problems these programs aim to solve. For instance, rather than empowering individuals to become self-reliant, these programs create a dependency trap, where the incentive to seek employment or improve one’s economic standing is diminished.

From a psychological perspective, the impact of entitlement programs on individual behaviour and societal norms cannot be overlooked. These programs promote a victim mentality and a decline in personal responsibility. The ethos of self-reliance and personal accountability are undercut by this mindset, where people believe society owes them something. They are owed nothing but the disdain of those they exploit and abuse.

In communities across the Northern Territory, there are observable shifts in attitudes towards work, family, and community responsibilities. This shift has profound implications not just for the economic well-being of these communities but also for their social fabric and cultural values. Many of these imposed cultural values are now generational and it is reasonable that those who have lived with undeserved privilege for so long will cry discrimination when their rewards are diminished or stopped altogether.

The experience of the Northern Territory serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of well-intentioned entitlement programs. While the aim of such programs was widely promoted to support the disadvantaged, their execution led to increased crime, systemic injustice, and economic inefficiency. The key to addressing these challenges lies in policies that promote personal responsibility, self-reliance, and fair and efficient use of resources. Only by striking a balance between providing a safety net, removing the handouts, replacing them with hand-ups, and encouraging individual initiative can the true objectives of social justice and economic prosperity be achieved.

Looking ahead, the most formidable challenge that Australians are likely to face stems from a troubling trend in the legal sphere – the rise of what can be described as 'lawfare', driven by activist judges. These judges, often guided by theories that have been demonstrably discredited, are not necessarily armed with the law on their side. Instead, their influence arises from interpretations of the law that are both delusional and destructive, born from ideologies that are fundamentally at odds with the principles of a civil society. This issue is compounded by a lack of accountability and fair judicial oversight, allowing these judges to operate with what appears to be a disturbing lack of moral and ethical compass. Such a scenario not only undermines the integrity of the legal system but also poses a significant threat to the balance and fairness that are essential in any just society. From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

3 views0 comments


bottom of page