top of page

Cultural Divisions and Identity Politics: How They've Affected Social Cohesion in the Northern Territory

In the contemporary discourse of Australian society, particularly in the Northern Territory (NT), a remarkable shift has occurred—a transition from a collective, cohesive society to one fragmented by cultural divisions and identity politics. This phenomenon, while not unique to the NT, presents unique challenges and opportunities in this context.

Identity politics, the tendency to form exclusive political alliances based on aspects of identity such as race, religion, or gender, has increasingly dominated the social fabric of the NT. This approach, while ostensibly aimed at promoting inclusiveness and diversity, always leads to the paradox of division. By emphasising differences rather than commonalities, these politics foster a climate of segregation and misunderstanding.

From an economic standpoint, the theories of renowned economists like Mises shed a revealing light on this situation. The concept of opportunity cost, for instance, suggests that the focus on identity politics may divert resources and attention from other pressing issues. The idea of spontaneous order also provides an interesting lens, suggesting that social harmony better emerges from unplanned interactions and relationships rather than from orchestrated attempts to engineer society based on identity groups.

The psychological impact of these cultural divisions cannot be overstated. A sense of belonging and community is fundamental to human well-being, yet identity politics erodes these feelings, replacing them with a sense of alienation and competition among groups. Moreover, the emphasis on group identity over individual identity diminishes personal responsibility and agency, key components of a healthy, functioning society.

In the NT, these dynamics manifest in various ways. For instance, the relationship between Indigenous communities and other residents in the major townships has often been strained, with identity politics exacerbating these tensions rather than alleviating them. Programs and policies aimed at bridging gaps create further division, as they are perceived as favouring one group over another rather than addressing the needs and concerns of all residents.

The notion of 'positive discrimination' is a misnomer. Discrimination, by its very nature, implies a departure from a standard of impartiality and fairness. When prefaced with 'positive,' it suggests a benevolent intent, yet it remains fundamentally at odds with the principles of equal treatment and meritocracy. The idea that discrimination can be constructive when it favours certain groups undermines the very essence of fairness. True progress lies not in reversing the direction of injustice, but in eradicating it altogether.

Another example can be observed in the realm of education. Schools and universities, in an effort to be inclusive, implement policies that inadvertently highlight differences and foster a sense of separateness among students. This is counterproductive, as it detracts from the shared experience of learning and growing together, irrespective of background.

The principles of fair and just governance are crucial in addressing these challenges. The notion that justice should be blind to identity is pivotal. Policies and laws should aim for fairness and equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcome, which is often the focus of identity politics.

Moving towards greater social cohesion in the NT requires a shift in perspective. It involves recognising and celebrating the uniqueness of each individual, rather than focusing primarily on group identities. It also entails fostering open dialogue and understanding rather than silencing or marginalising voices that diverge from the mainstream narrative of identity politics. It wasn't that aboriginal people needed a voice; it was that nobody in power was listening to them, and the new bureaucratic powers proposed would have diminished their voices even more.

While identity politics and cultural divisions are a reality in the Northern Territory, as in many other parts of the world, their impact on social cohesion is a complex issue. The path forward lies not in further entrenching these divisions but in seeking common ground and fostering a sense of shared purpose and community. Only through such efforts can the NT, and indeed any society, hope to thrive in a truly inclusive and cohesive manner.  From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

2 views0 comments


bottom of page