top of page

Moral Hazard: The Perils of Government Intervention in Encouraging Risky Behaviour

The concept of 'moral hazard' emerges as a critical yet often overlooked consequence of government intervention in various sectors. This phenomenon occurs when an entity is shielded from the risks associated with its actions, often leading to riskier behaviour than it would have undertaken otherwise. In the context of economic and social governance, understanding the implications of moral hazard is essential, especially when evaluating the role of government policies and their unintended consequences.

Australia, with its diverse economic landscape, provides fertile ground for observing the dynamics of moral hazards. One notable example is in the banking sector. The implicit guarantee of government bailouts for major banks, as witnessed during the global financial crisis, led to riskier lending practices. Banks, cushioned by the safety net of potential government intervention, engaged in lending with less regard for the borrowers' ability to repay.

Another illustration is found in the field of environmental management. Government subsidies or relief programs for natural disasters, while necessary for immediate relief, inadvertently encouraged individuals and businesses to locate in high-risk areas. This relocation to flood-prone or fire-prone regions, under the assumption of government assistance in times of disaster, epitomizes a moral hazard.

The roots of moral hazard lie in the core principles of economic and psychological theories. From an economic standpoint, the distortion of risk incentives due to government intervention lead to inefficiencies and market failures. This misalignment of risk and responsibility fosters a situation in which the actor is not fully responsible for the consequences of their actions, which results in harmful decisions.

Psychologically, this ties into the human propensity to underestimate risks when they perceive a safety net. This perception, whether accurate or not, influences decision-making, often skewing towards increased risk-taking.

The presence of moral hazards necessitates a vigilant approach to security and risk management. In industries and sectors where government intervention is significant, strategies must be developed to mitigate the risks of reckless behaviour. This involves not just regulatory compliance but also a proactive stance in identifying and managing potential risks, be they financial, ethical, or operational.

To combat moral hazard, a multi-pronged strategy is essential. Policymakers must balance the need for intervention with the potential for creating perverse incentives. This entails creating regulations or supports that are necessary while ensuring that the relevant parties have internalised the risks sufficiently.

Economic solutions might include restructuring government support systems to incorporate more significant risk-sharing by beneficiaries. For instance, in the banking sector, measures such as higher capital requirements or contingent convertible bonds can ensure that banks internalise a greater portion of the risk.

In environmental management, policies could focus on more stringent zoning laws and building codes, discouraging settlement in high-risk areas, and reducing the expectation of automatic government bailouts in the event of natural disasters.

While government intervention is often well-intentioned, it is crucial to recognise and address the moral hazard it can create. The Australian context provides clear examples of how government policies can inadvertently encourage riskier behaviour, leading to broader economic and social implications. To address these issues, one must have a thorough understanding of both economic and psychological concepts. Ultimately, the aim should be to create a balance where government support is available but does not encourage recklessness, thus fostering a more responsible and efficient economic environment.

From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

10 views0 comments


bottom of page