top of page

The Benefits of Close Personal Protection Security for Diplomats and Ambassadors



In the realm of international diplomacy and statecraft, the safety of diplomats and ambassadors is vital. The First World War I is a glowing example of the need for effective security personnel to ensure international peace. This necessity transcends mere physical security; it embodies the intricate tapestry of legal and practical dimensions of state relations.


The concept of personal security for diplomats finds its roots in the fundamental principles of justice and economic stability. The rule of law must prevail, according to philosophical legal theorists, in order for diplomatic missions to be sacred. It's not just about protecting individuals but preserving a framework wherein international relations can flourish free from the threat of coercion or violence.


Moreover, the economic implications are profound. Renowned economists have long argued that security is not just a commodity but a prerequisite for economic exchange and cooperation. In the absence of assured safety, the diplomatic dialogues necessary for trade, investment, and economic collaboration cannot occur unimpeded.


From a psychological viewpoint, the assurance of safety is crucial for the mental well-being of those tasked with the heavy responsibility of representing their nations. The stress and anxiety accompanying security threats can impede rational decision-making, a scenario detrimental to the delicate processes of diplomatic negotiation.


Equally, the societal impact is significant. High-profile incidents involving diplomats can have far-reaching implications, shaping public perception and influencing foreign policy decisions. Various incidents in Australia have highlighted the significance of close personal protection. The proactive measures taken to protect foreign dignitaries during international summits in Sydney and Melbourne exemplify a commitment to this principle. The very real failures in practical security and personal safety occurred in 2012, when our then Prime Minister Julia Gillard and opposition leader Tony Abbott had to be forcefully removed to protect them from Aboriginal rights activists in Canberra, resulting in a lost shoe by the Prime Minister Gillard. These operations, often unseen and, in the case of 2012, extremely public, ensure that diplomats can perform their duties without the looming shadow of a personal threat.


Drawing on the wisdom of security experts, the approach to diplomatic security is holistic. It involves not just the physical guarding of individuals but a comprehensive strategy encompassing threat assessment, risk management, and crisis response. This multidimensional strategy is essential in an era where threats are increasingly asymmetric and unpredictable.


The protection of diplomats is a multifaceted issue that intertwines philosophy, economic stability, psychological well-being, and practical security measures. It's a symbiotic relationship: effective security enables diplomacy, and successful diplomacy, in turn, fosters a safer, more cooperative world stage.


From the author.


 The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

 

1 view0 comments

Comments


bottom of page