top of page

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Reducing Recidivism

Using effective crowd control techniques, I gained a significant understanding of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing recidivism. In this article, I hope to share my views on the effectiveness of CBT in reducing recidivism and its potential for improving rehabilitation outcomes for offenders.

Cognitive-behavioural therapy is a form of psychotherapy that aims to help individuals identify and change negative thought patterns and behaviours that contribute to their problems. In the context of criminal justice, youth justice, and crowd control, CBT is used to address cognitive distortions, emotional dysregulation, and other issues that contribute to criminal behaviour.

CBT is a promising approach to reducing recidivism and improving rehabilitation outcomes for offenders. CBT helped offenders develop the pro-social skills necessary for successful reintegration into society, such as empathy, self-control, and problem-solving.

There are challenges to implementing CBT effectively in the criminal justice system compared to private Crowd control, it requires effective training, and practical engagement. Successful implementation required a commitment to evidence-based practices, including the use of standardized assessment tools, both written and verbal, to identify individuals who could benefit from CBT. A civil conversation may reveal several key factors, and these must be recorded and reaffirmed for validation.

The importance of providing ongoing support to offenders who receive CBT is crucial as well, proximity is powerful, and when those that are benefiting are identified by co-offenders, they are often targeted for reeducation. Follow-up care and support are essential in helping offenders maintain the gains they achieve through CBT and avoid future criminal behaviour.

One of the key challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of CBT in reducing recidivism is the complexity of the criminal justice system. Many factors, including social, economic, and environmental factors, contribute to criminal behavior, making it difficult to isolate the impact of CBT on recidivism. My most effective subjects were able to make both social and environmental changes in their lives that removed the motivational pathways towards criminality.

I believe that the evidence I observed and that of others around me, suggested that CBT could be effective in reducing recidivism. There are several studies showing that CBT could significantly reduce recidivism rates, particularly when combined with other evidence-based practices such as medication-assisted treatment and case management. However, this requires a proactive approach to medical treatment, and Australia, with its rationed care policies and procedures, fails to provide adequate support for such actions. This may reduce its effectiveness on a proportion of the subjects we engage with.

The effectiveness of CBT could vary depending on the individual and the context in which it is provided. It is essential to tailor CBT to the specific needs of each individual and to provide ongoing support and monitoring to ensure that the gains achieved through CBT are maintained over time. By choosing to stay at a particular location for a 2 year period to monitor and maintain effective records and interactions, I was able to make a significant observable impact.

The biggest challenge in implementing CBT in the criminal and juvenile justice systems is the availability of trained practitioners. It is essential to ensure that practitioners providing CBT are effectively trained and supervised to ensure that they are using evidence-based practices and delivering CBT effectively. The tools that can be used to help, can also be used to manipulate. Authenticity, discipline, and self-regulation are musts for practitioners.

The importance of addressing systemic barriers to the implementation of CBT in the criminal justice system cannot be ignored. The criminal justice system needs to prioritize evidence-based practices and invest in training and resources to support the implementation of CBT and other effective interventions. The current systems in place do not promote accountability, responsibility, deterrence, or regulation. They promote distraction, relocation, and incarceration.

There are major failures and flaws in the current criminal justice system. Much of this is due to health system interventions that classify basic behavioural trait disorders and their combinations, with "Mental illness" and a range of pseudoscientific "diseases" so they can promote whatever pharmaceutical product has the greatest incentives. Unfortunately, mental health care in Australia has to deal with more drug lobbyists (drug dealers) than it does health practitioners.

There is also an undeserved level of respect given to Australian health bureaucrats, many of whom played a direct part in the increased death rate of Australians over the last 2 years, from 12% to 17%, while still avoiding scrutiny, accountability, and, for many, judicial incarceration. This does, however, highlight a massive opportunity for private practitioners to gain credibility and investment through evidence-based practices.

I believe that cognitive-behavioral therapy is a promising approach to reducing recidivism and improving rehabilitation outcomes for offenders. CBT helps offenders develop the pro-social skills necessary for successful reintegration into society and reduces the likelihood of future criminal behavior. I recognize the challenges to implementing CBT effectively in the criminal and juvenile justice systems, but I believe that evidence suggests that it could be effective when tailored to the needs of individual offenders and supported by ongoing care and monitoring. I hope this article articulates my passion for an effective program, and although I understand the challenges we face and the discord I may cause by stating evidence-based facts that paint the Australian health system in a poor light, the goal is to motivate positive change, not accept the current failures as a norm. From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

5 views0 comments


bottom of page