top of page

The Effects of PC Culture on Environmental Conservation Efforts

Political correctness (PC) culture, with its emphasis on sensitivity to language and behaviour, has become a pervasive influence in various spheres of life, including environmental conservation. In the Northern Territory of Australia, where diverse cultural identities and rich natural landscapes intersect, the impact of PC culture on environmental efforts is particularly significant. This article examines how the principles underlying PC culture shape environmental conservation, drawing on insights from judicial philosophy, economics, psychology, psychiatry, security, personality theory, and crowd behaviour.

Political correctness, in its quest to avoid offence and promote inclusivity, often intersects with environmental conservation in complex ways. On one hand, it encourages respect for Indigenous knowledge and practices, promoting a more inclusive approach to conservation. On the other hand, it can lead to bureaucratic constraints and the stifling of open dialogue, which are crucial for effective environmental policy-making.

Economically, the influence of PC culture on environmental conservation may be both beneficial and detrimental. Emphasising inclusivity and equity, PC culture often advocates for the allocation of resources to marginalised communities, including Indigenous groups, to support their conservation efforts. This they promote will lead to more sustainable and culturally sensitive environmental practices. However, the result is the misallocation of resources, driven more by social agendas than by environmental necessity. There is no evidence of positive outcomes from any of the environmentalist policies promoted worldwide.

In the Northern Territory, initiatives such as the Indigenous Ranger Program illustrate this dual impact. While the program empowers Indigenous communities and incorporates traditional ecological knowledge into conservation, it faces criticism for prioritising social outcomes over environmental efficacy. Balancing these priorities is essential for sustainable conservation and to regain trust from a sceptical public.

From a psychological perspective, PC culture fosters a greater sense of environmental stewardship by promoting values of respect and empathy towards nature and marginalised communities. However, it also creates an environment where individuals are hesitant to voice dissenting opinions or innovative ideas for fear of offending others or being labelled insensitive.

This dynamic is evident in the debates surrounding the management of Kakadu National Park. While efforts to involve Indigenous voices in the park's management are commendable, there have been instances where differing views on land use and conservation practices have led to tensions. Encouraging open dialogue and mutual respect is crucial for resolving these conflicts and advancing conservation goals.

From a security standpoint, environmental conservation efforts influenced by PC culture must navigate potential risks associated with protests and activism. While advocacy for environmental protection is expected, it leads to confrontations and safety concerns, particularly when issues of identity and inclusion are at play.

The campaign against fracking in the Beetaloo Basin highlights these security challenges. Activists, including Indigenous groups and environmentalists, have raised valid concerns about the environmental and cultural impacts of fracking. However, the heightened sensitivity around PC issues has complicated efforts to manage protests and ensure safety for all involved. Effective risk assessment and crowd management are essential in such scenarios.

Culturally, PC culture promotes the recognition and integration of diverse perspectives in environmental conservation. This inclusivity could enrich conservation efforts by incorporating traditional knowledge and practices. However, it has also led to cultural clashes and misunderstandings when not managed carefully.

The controversy surrounding the development of Uluru's tourist infrastructure illustrates this tension. Efforts to respect Indigenous cultural significance by restricting climbing on Uluru have been lauded for their cultural sensitivity. However, they have also faced backlash from the actual traditional owners and elders, who have been disenfranchised, disregarded, and ignored, as well as many tourists and businesses, highlighting the need for an honest, transparent approach that respects cultural values while considering economic and recreational interests. The needs of the political parties as we observed from the failed "Voice Campaign" and the loss of half a billion dollars, often has nothing to do with the needs of the public and society as a whole.

Understanding personality and identity dynamics is crucial for appreciating how individuals and groups respond to PC culture in environmental conservation. People with different personality traits and identities react differently to conservation initiatives framed within a PC context. Recognising these differences helps tailor conservation efforts to be more effective, legitimate, and inclusive.

For instance, initiatives that promote conservation through community involvement, such as the Landcare movement, benefit from acknowledging diverse personality traits and motivations. Engaging individuals through various roles, from leadership to hands-on activities, enhances participation and fosters a sense of ownership over conservation projects. However, many landcare movements have struggled to maintain long-term engagement and commitment from volunteers. This is in no small way to the perceived lack of impact or progress being made in their efforts.

Australia offers several case studies that illuminate the effects of PC culture on environmental conservation. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority's efforts to incorporate Indigenous knowledge into reef management highlight the challenges of this approach. While it promotes inclusivity and sustainability, it also faces hurdles related to differing views on conservation priorities and methods. The lack of credibility in the universities and environmental predictions on the Great Barrier Reef have delegitimized the authority of officials and "experts" provided by the government.

Internationally, the Standing Rock protests in the United States provide a parallel example. The intersection of Indigenous rights, environmental conservation, and PC culture led to a complex and highly charged situation. While the protests succeeded in raising awareness and halting pipeline construction, they also underscored the difficulties in balancing cultural sensitivity with practical environmental and economic considerations. The 300% increase in gas prices and the impact on low-income communities have been devastating. At least 14 workers directly committed suicide due to the loss of their jobs when Biden implemented stricter environmental regulations. The brain drain from the US to South America and Europe as expertise in these fields leaves the US has led to an economic depression that has placed over 30 million American citizens below the poverty line. The situation has become dire, with no end in sight.

Looking ahead, the influence of PC culture on environmental conservation in the Northern Territory and beyond will likely continue to evolve. As societies become more diverse and interconnected, the need for inclusive and culturally sensitive conservation practices will grow. However, this will also require a deeper understanding of the economic, psychological, security, cultural, and personality dimensions involved. The destruction that PC Culture can impose is devastating.

Future conservation efforts must strive to balance inclusivity with practicality, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively and that diverse perspectives are genuinely integrated into decision-making processes. This involves fostering open dialogue, transparency, promoting mutual respect, and recognising the value of both traditional and scientific knowledge.

Political correctness plays a significant role in shaping environmental conservation efforts in the Northern Territory. As environmental efforts continue to evolve, they will reflect the ongoing dialogue between tradition and modernity, inclusivity and practicality, and identity and environmental stewardship. Through thoughtful planning and a commitment to these principles, conservation initiatives may serve as powerful platforms for protecting the rich natural and cultural heritage of differing culture, or they will continue to ignore the homogenization they impose, the languages lost and the ever growing welfare dependency they impose by censoring malevolent actions and beliefs, under the guise of benevolent intention.

From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

1 view0 comments


bottom of page