top of page

The Ethics of Private Security: A Rawlsian Perspective


In the ever-evolving and growing field of private security, ethical considerations play a pivotal role in shaping practices and policies. This is especially pertinent in regions like the Northern Territory of Australia, where the diverse demands of urban, rural, and remote communities pose unique challenges. The essence of providing security services lies not just in the effectiveness of these services but also in their adherence to ethical principles that respect the rights and dignity of all individuals involved.


John Rawls, a luminary in the field of philosophical ethics, proposed a theory of justice grounded in fairness and equality. Rawls' principles, though primarily framed for societal governance, offer a compelling lens through which to view private security. His first principle, advocating for equal rights and liberties, resonates profoundly with the core responsibilities of security professionals. It suggests that security measures should not only protect but also respect the rights of individuals, irrespective of their social or economic status.


In the Northern Territory, this principle is particularly relevant. Consider the deployment of security in remote indigenous communities. Historically, these communities have faced disparities in security service provision, often receiving less attention and fewer resources. A Rawlsian approach would advocate for a fair distribution of security resources, ensuring that remote communities are not disadvantaged in their access to protection and justice.


Fairness in private security also extends to how security personnel interact with the public. In Darwin, for instance, the nightlife economy thrives, bringing with it a spectrum of security challenges. Security staff in entertainment precincts must balance the need to maintain order with respect for individual liberties. This includes fair treatment of patrons, irrespective of their background or behaviour. The application of force, when necessary, must be proportionate and justifiable, aligning with Rawls' view that inequalities are permissible only if they benefit the least advantaged in society.


Equality in private security is not about treating every situation identically but about acknowledging and adapting to the diverse needs of different groups. In the context of the Northern Territory, this means recognising the unique security needs of urban areas like Alice Springs as well as the distinct requirements of rural and indigenous communities. A one-size-fits-all approach does not suffice. Instead, a nuanced understanding of each community's specific security concerns is vital.


A poignant example can be found in the approach to security in indigenous communities. These communities often face unique challenges, such as geographical isolation and cultural differences. Implementing security measures that are both effective and culturally sensitive requires a deep understanding of the community's needs and values. Rawls' principle of fairness obligates security providers to engage with these communities, ensuring that their voices are heard and their rights are protected.


The balance between security and liberty is a delicate one. In a Rawlsian framework, the liberties of individuals should not be compromised for the sake of security unless it results in greater benefits for the least advantaged. This principle challenges security providers to constantly evaluate their practices, ensuring that the rights to privacy, freedom of movement, and personal autonomy are upheld to the greatest extent possible.


Applying Rawls' theory of justice to private security in the Northern Territory offers a fresh perspective on ethical practice. It emphasises the need for fairness, equality, and respect for individual rights. As the private security industry continues to grow and evolve, these principles provide a solid ethical foundation, ensuring that security services contribute positively to the fabric of society.


I recommend the book "The Law of Peoples" by John Rawls, although many may ascertain that he does not directly address the private security industry, security personnel would be directly comparable to the role of the "civilian", a civil person, and the book explores the concepts of justice and fairness that are relevant to ethical decision-making in any field.


From the author.


The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.


3 views0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page