top of page

The Evolving Threats of Economic Crime and Terrorism

In today’s global economy, the threats from economic crime and terrorism are both diverse and complex, posing significant challenges to businesses and governments alike. These threats have evolved in tandem with technological advancements and changes in the global socio-economic landscape.

Economic crime encompasses a wide range of illicit activities that occur within the workplace and beyond, impacting industries and economies worldwide. From the issuing of fraudulent checks to sophisticated phishing scams, these crimes have shown a remarkable capacity to adapt to new economic environments. For instance, the rise of digital banking and e-commerce has led to corresponding increases in cyber-related economic offences such as identity theft and online fraud.

A reported case occurred in Sydney, where a group engaged in an elaborate embezzlement scheme that syphoned millions from a major corporation over several years. The scheme involved the manipulation of financial systems and the exploitation of weak audit controls, highlighting the need for robust internal security measures. This at a time when billions of dollars have been sent to the Northern Territory and granted to hundreds of NGO's that avoid auditing requirements due to indigenous partnerships and apartheid legislation that enables fraud and corruption to run rife.

While governmental agencies have traditionally focused on hardening targets against organised terrorist groups, this approach has often diverted attention from equally potent threats. "Lone wolves" and individuals with no clear affiliations to terror groups, sometimes referred to dismissively as "kooks," represent a significant and hard-to-predict danger. These individuals can carry out devastating attacks without the logistical networks that typically characterise organised terror groups.

For example, a tragic incident at a workplace where an employee returned to target their supervisor underscores the unpredictable nature of individual acts of violence and the broad spectrum of what might be considered terrorist activity.

In response to these diverse threats, the development of specialised task forces has proven effective. These units, often composed of multiple agencies, enhance the capability to monitor and respond to a range of threats, from organised retail crime to cyber terrorism. In New Zealand, for instance, a joint task force has been instrumental in cracking down on organised crime syndicates involved in large-scale fraud, leveraging both intelligence expertise and advanced analytical software to predict and prevent criminal activities.

Although not traditionally associated with groups like Al-Qaeda, cyberterrorism poses a significant risk. The potential for cyberattacks to disrupt critical infrastructure and cause economic chaos is becoming more apparent. For instance, a major denial-of-service attack targeting financial institutions in the UK demonstrated the vulnerability of critical sectors to cyber threats, emphasising the need for enhanced cyber resilience strategies.

Ecoterrorism has also seen a rise in both frequency and sophistication. These groups often operate under the radar but have been known to target corporations with increasing violence, causing substantial economic damage and disruption. In Australia, for example, ecoterrorists have targeted mining operations, employing tactics that range from sabotage to public demonstrations, significantly impacting operations and drawing attention to environmental issues.

The increase of ideologically indoctrinated teens and schoolchildren carrying out the terrorist attacks has put security personnel in the crosshairs of activist judicial members and activists who have used doxing, and vexatious litigation and complaints. For instance, in the NT, under the Criminal Code Act 1983, Sections 29 and 43, the reasonable use of force is justifiable to stop the damage of property and to protect individuals from self harm. Often groups of teens with an entitlement mentality and no respect or appreciation for the laws find themselves being physically removed from sites and escorted to the authorities or off the property. Often, these youths seek to associate eviction with arrest and/or detainment; however, they are not being detained; they are being removed for their own safety and the continued safety of the public. They may protest on public land, but have no rights to be on private land or licenced areas with to without a guardian if they are trespassed. No reason needs to be given, however their behavior is often the motivating factor

The landscape of security threats is continuously evolving, with economic crime and terrorism adapting to new technologies and changing global dynamics. Businesses and governments must therefore remain vigilant and adaptable, employing a combination of advanced technology, strategic task forces, and cross-sector collaboration to mitigate these risks. Understanding and anticipating these threats is not just about protecting assets but also about ensuring the stability of global economies and the safety of individuals worldwide. It requires a proactive approach to security that involves constant monitoring and adaptation to emerging threats.

From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

1 view0 comments


bottom of page