top of page

The Pernicious Path of Benevolence, From Welfare Dependency to Democide


The historical record is replete with instances where well-intentioned government policies have led to devastating consequences. Nowhere is this more evident than in the seemingly benevolent initiatives of welfare dependency, rationed health care through government subsidies, and unaccountable bureaucrat-controlled education systems. These policies, often implemented under the guise of compassion, entrap individuals and communities in cycles of dependency and despair, leading to outcomes that are both tragic and far-reaching. This analysis delves into how such policies, particularly in the context of Australia, culminate in what some might term a form of systemic slavery or even democide.

Welfare programs are typically designed to provide a safety net for the vulnerable, ensuring that basic needs are met. However, the structure and implementation of these programs create a paradox where aid meant to alleviate poverty instead entrenches it. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in the Northern Territory, where extensive welfare support has led to a cycle of dependency among Indigenous communities.


Consider the case of widespread unemployment among Indigenous Australians. Despite the availability of welfare benefits, these programs inadvertently disincentivize work. When financial support is provided without corresponding obligations, the motivation to seek employment or education diminishes. This dynamic creates a situation where individuals are trapped in a state of dependency, unable to break free from the constraints imposed by their reliance on government aid.


The psychological impact of such dependency cannot be overstated. Long-term reliance on welfare erodes self-esteem and a sense of purpose, leading to a host of social and psychological issues. Individuals who do not engage in productive work experience a loss of identity and self-worth, which manifest in various destructive behaviours, including substance abuse and domestic violence.


From an economic perspective, welfare dependency undermines local economies by stifling productivity and innovation. In the Northern Territory, many remote Indigenous communities rely heavily on government transfers, which form the bulk of their income. This reliance on welfare stifles local enterprise and economic development, as there is little incentive for individuals to engage in productive activities or entrepreneurial endeavours. Even more insidious is the proliferation of taxpayer funded Non-Government organisations sent into communities to provide services that compete directly against local services and community programs. The choice is to stay local or accept subsidised programs without any accountability and when it comes down to cost, the NGOs win hands down, even as the community loses.


Welfare programs that do not incorporate accountability measures lead to significant financial burdens on the state. The cost of maintaining extensive welfare systems strains public finances, diverting resources from other critical areas such as infrastructure, education, and health care. This misallocation of resources has long-term detrimental effects on economic growth and social cohesion.


Government-subsidised health care systems, while ostensibly designed to provide universal access to medical services, result in rationed care and substandard outcomes. Iatrogenisis, based on 2023–2024 figures, is currently the biggest killer in Australia, and with a system that is predominantly filled with health bureaucrats, it is not a stretch to call it democide. In Australia, the public health system is frequently stretched to its limits, leading to long waiting times and limited access, if any, to specialised treatments. This issue is particularly acute in the Northern Territory, where remote communities face significant barriers to accessing quality health care and where the effects of iatrogenisis can have far more damaging results.


The rationing of health care services has dire consequences for individuals and communities. Delayed treatments and inadequate medical care exacerbate health problems, leading to preventable illnesses and deaths. The lack of timely and effective health care services disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including Indigenous communities, further entrenching health disparities and social inequities.


The centralisation of health care services in government hands often leads to inefficiencies and bureaucratic inertia. Decision-making processes become mired in red tape, preventing the swift and effective allocation of resources. This bureaucratic inefficiency not only hampers the delivery of health care services but also erodes public trust in the health care system.

The education system, particularly in the context of the Northern Territory, provides another stark example of how well-intentioned policies lead to negative outcomes. Government-controlled schools, often shielded from accountability, become breeding grounds for inefficiency and mediocrity. In most cases, these schools fail to provide the quality education needed to equip students with the skills and knowledge required for economic participation and personal development.


In the Northern Territory, the educational attainment of Indigenous students remains alarmingly low despite substantial government investment. The lack of accountability and performance metrics within the education system means that schools are not incentivized to improve outcomes. As a result, students are left without the necessary tools to succeed in the modern economy, perpetuating cycles of poverty and dependency. Even government funded community education centres like Bachelor have proven a giant waste of money and are mired in well reported infractions.


The impact of poor education is far-reaching, affecting not only individual prospects but also the broader community. A poorly educated population is less likely to engage in productive economic activities, leading to reduced economic growth and increased social tensions. Furthermore, inadequate education contributes to social problems such as crime and substance abuse, exacerbating the challenges faced by vulnerable communities.

When examining the cumulative effects of welfare dependency, rationed health care, and an unaccountable education system, it becomes apparent that these policies lead to outcomes that resemble democide—a term used to describe the killing of a population by its own government through neglect or direct actions. While the term might seem extreme, the systemic effects of these policies indeed result in widespread harm and suffering.


Welfare dependency traps individuals and communities in a cycle of poverty and despair, leading to a loss of agency and self-determination. Rationed health care results in preventable deaths and suffering, particularly among the most vulnerable populations. An inadequate education system stifles personal and economic development, perpetuating social inequalities and tensions.


The combined impact of these policies leads to a form of systemic oppression, where individuals are deprived of the opportunities and resources needed to improve their circumstances. This form of imposed dependency and control can be viewed as a modern form of slavery, where the state, under the guise of benevolence, exerts a form of malevolent control over its population.

To illustrate these concepts, consider the plight of many Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. Despite substantial government support, these communities struggle with high levels of poverty, unemployment, and social dysfunction. The reliance on welfare benefits has stifled economic development, while the inadequacies of the public health and education systems have perpetuated health disparities and educational deficits.


For instance, in many remote Indigenous communities, the lack of access to quality health care services has led to higher rates of preventable diseases and mortality. The centralised control of health care resources has resulted in inefficiencies and delays, exacerbating health inequities. The refusal of modern contemporary health services to work with indigenous traditions. Similarly, the failure of the education system to provide quality education has left many Indigenous students without the skills needed to succeed in the workforce, perpetuating cycles of poverty and dependency.


The implications of these policies extend beyond the Northern Territory. Globally, similar patterns can be observed in other regions where government welfare programs and centralised control of services have led to negative outcomes. These examples highlight the need for a critical reassessment of welfare policies and the importance of fostering personal responsibility, economic participation, and accountability.

To tackle issues like welfare dependency, rationed healthcare, and unaccountable education systems, policymakers should consider incentive structures, decentralisation of services, accountability measures, economic opportunities, and community involvement. Incentive structures encourage self-sufficiency and reduce dependency through productive activities like job training and education. Decentralisation improves efficiency and responsiveness, while accountability measures ensure the programs achieve their intended outcomes. By balancing cultural preservation with economic pragmatism, it is possible to foster economic opportunities by revising regulations that impede investment and infrastructure growth. Community involvement ensures cultural sensitivity and local relevance in program design and implementation.

The analysis of welfare dependency, rationed health care, and unaccountable education systems through an economic, psychological, and philosophical lens reveals the profound and destructive impact of these policies. While reportedly well-intentioned, these initiatives lead to outcomes that undermine individual self-reliance, economic development, and social cohesion. By fostering personal responsibility, promoting economic participation, and ensuring accountability, policymakers transform these systems from instruments of dependency and control into catalysts for empowerment and prosperity. The journey from imposed benevolence to genuine empowerment is essential for the long-term well-being and prosperity of communities in the Northern Territory and beyond.


From the author.

 The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

1 view0 comments


bottom of page