top of page

Language and Cultural Preservation vs. PC Language

In recent years, the rise of political correctness (PC) has profoundly affected various aspects of society, including language and cultural preservation. This phenomenon is particularly significant among Australia's Aboriginal communities, where the tension between preserving cultural heritage and adhering to politically correct norms has led to complex social dynamics. This article explores how the censorship of discourse and the promotion of certain ideological frameworks are influencing Aboriginal cultural language and historical narratives.

Language is a cornerstone of cultural identity. For Aboriginal Australians, their languages carry the weight of millennia of history, tradition, and knowledge. Efforts to preserve these languages are essential for maintaining cultural continuity and identity. However, the imposition of politically correct language norms often complicates these efforts.

Political correctness, while well-intentioned in its aim to promote inclusivity and respect, inadvertently stifles the authentic expression of cultural identities. In Aboriginal communities, there is a delicate balance between preserving traditional languages and adapting to contemporary linguistic norms imposed by external influences. The pressure to use politically correct language, which obscures the richness and distinctiveness of Aboriginal languages, exacerbates this tension.

Economic theories suggest that incentives matter. When government policies and funding are tied to adherence to specific ideological frameworks, such as the Australian government's promotion of socialism and Marxism, they create powerful incentives for communities to align with these ideologies. In the case of Aboriginal communities, this alignment often involves adopting language and practices that are deemed politically correct, at the expense of traditional cultural expressions.

Aboriginal leaders who promote socialism and Marxism often emphasise collective ownership and communal living. Many of those who promoted the failed "Voice Campaign" were active communists. While these ideas resonate with some aspects of traditional Aboriginal culture, they also clash with other cultural values and practices. The pressure to adopt politically correct language and ideologies leads to a revision of historical narratives, where traditional cultural practices are reinterpreted through the lens of contemporary political ideologies. Those tribes that cater to the needs of these ideologies and the financial incentives of those aligned with them, using taxpayer funds, are often elevated and rewarded for their compliance. This causes greater division and conflict between tribal neighbours.

From a psychological perspective, the shame and guilt associated with deviating from politically correct norms can have a profound impact on individuals and communities. The fear of being labelled insensitive or culturally inappropriate stifles open dialogue and honest discourse. This dynamic is particularly detrimental in the context of cultural preservation, where open and honest communication is crucial for passing down traditions and knowledge.

In Aboriginal communities, the promotion of certain ideological frameworks creates a social environment where traditional cultural expressions are suppressed. Individuals who speak out against these frameworks or who advocate for the preservation of traditional practices may be marginalised or shamed. This environment not only undermines cultural preservation but also fosters division and resentment within communities.

The intersection of political correctness and security is another critical aspect to consider. Public discourse around sensitive cultural issues leads to heightened tensions and conflict. Ensuring the safety and security of all parties involved requires careful management and a balanced approach.

In Australia, debates around Aboriginal land rights and cultural preservation often involve passionate advocacy and protest. While these activities are vital for raising awareness and advocating for change, they also escalate into confrontations. Effective risk assessment and crowd management are essential for ensuring that these events remain peaceful and productive.

Culturally, the imposition of politically correct language norms leads to the erosion of traditional cultural expressions. The richness of Aboriginal languages, with their unique structures and vocabularies, is diluted when forced to conform to externally imposed linguistic standards. This phenomenon is not limited to language but extends to other cultural practices and narratives.

The rewriting of history through a politically correct lens obscures the true diversity and complexity of Aboriginal cultures. Traditional stories and historical accounts may be reinterpreted or sanitised to align with contemporary ideological frameworks. While this may promote a certain kind of inclusivity, it also risks erasing the authentic voices and experiences of Aboriginal people.

Understanding the dynamics of personality and identity is crucial for appreciating how individuals and groups respond to politically correct norms. People with different personality traits and identities react differently to the pressure of conforming to these norms. Recognising these differences creates more inclusive and effective cultural preservation strategies.

In Aboriginal communities, leaders and individuals with diverse personality traits and identities contribute to the richness of cultural expressions. Encouraging a range of voices and perspectives is essential for fostering a vibrant and dynamic cultural landscape. This requires creating an environment where individuals feel free to express their authentic selves without fear of censorship or marginalisation.

Australia provides several case studies that illustrate the impact of politically correct language norms on cultural preservation. The controversy surrounding the teaching of Aboriginal history in schools is one such example. Efforts to include Aboriginal perspectives in the curriculum are essential for promoting cultural understanding and reconciliation. However, the pressure to present these perspectives in a politically correct manner leads to the sanitization and oversimplification of complex historical narratives.

Many of the ideological activists in the education departments have promoted that children born today, many of whom have no relatives who lived during colonisation, should apologise to people alive today who have never experienced the wrongs or injustices of the past. This type of indecency and child abuse should face the harshest of penalties. However, because those in government frequently adhere to these principles, it only causes more division.

The debate over the Australia Day celebrations is another example. For many Aboriginal people, Australia Day marks the beginning of colonisation and the dispossession of their lands. Efforts to change the date or reframe the celebrations to be more inclusive often involve politically correct language and narratives. While these efforts aim to promote inclusivity, they have led to divisions, violence, conflict, and misunderstandings.

Future efforts to preserve Aboriginal languages and cultures must strive to remain uncesnored and promote greater discourse. This involves creating spaces where traditional cultural expressions can thrive alongside contemporary practices. Encouraging open dialogue and mutual respect is essential for fostering a dynamic and inclusive cultural landscape.

Political correctness plays a significant destructive role in shaping language and cultural preservation efforts in Aboriginal communities. As efforts to preserve Aboriginal languages and cultures continue to evolve, they will reflect the ongoing dialogue between tradition and modernity, inclusivity and authenticity, and identity and cultural preservation. Through thoughtful dialogue, trade and a commitment to these principles, cultural preservation initiatives can serve as powerful platforms for celebrating and protecting the rich cultural heritage of Aboriginal Australians.

From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

1 view0 comments


bottom of page