top of page
  • Writer's pictureSam Wilks

Reduced Consumer Knowledge: The Consequences of Government Overreach on Information Access

The informed consumer is the lifeblood of a vibrant marketplace. Knowledge empowers individuals to make decisions that align with their self-interest and promotes the healthy competition that is the hallmark of a free economy. Yet, there emerges a disquieting trend where government interventions, often under the auspices of consumer protection, inadvertently or deliberately constrain the flow of information, leaving consumers less informed and markets less efficient.

Knowledge is not merely power; it is the premise upon which the edifice of a free market is constructed. Economists and social commentators have long championed the role of information in enabling consumers to make rational choices. When individuals are fully informed, they can assess the quality, safety, and value of products and services, guiding their decisions and fostering market efficiency.

In some cases, the government needs to step in to fix market failures and protect consumers by paying or imposing compensation. However, when it limits access to information, it is the government itself that causes market failures. Regulations that limit what can be said about products or require too much-complicated information that confuses rather than clarifies make consumers less knowledgeable, which leads and often coerces them to make decisions that aren't in their best interests or, in the case of emergency health mandates, killed thousands of Australians without any thought.

In Australia, the regulatory environment surrounding financial services has seen a proliferation of disclosures and mandatory guidelines intended to protect consumers. However, the sheer volume and complexity of this information often lead to confusion rather than clarity. For example, the implementation of the Australian Consumer Law has been criticised for creating layers of compliance that can obscure key information, making it harder for consumers to compare financial products effectively. This is exacerbated by a lack of funding for these consumer protection departments to provide ample staff to meet the needs of the public.

The limitation of access to information can have a profound impact on consumer behaviour. Consumers may over-rely on simplified heuristics or brand recognition rather than engaging with the details of their purchases. This dynamic leads to market distortions, where products and services are not priced in accordance with their true value but according to consumer perceptions shaped by incomplete information.

The advent of the internet has been a significant boon for consumer knowledge, offering an unprecedented wealth of information at the click of a button. Yet, even here, government intervention in the form of censorship or regulation of online content limits the exchange of ideas and information that is crucial for informed decision-making. Even now, the federal government is seeking to impose misinformation legislation that will obviously be used to protect them from civil litigation for their actions and impositions during the last 3 years.

While the intent behind government regulation is often to protect consumers, there is a delicate balance to be struck between protection and paternalism. Regulations should not be so burdensome as to stifle the information flow or so lax as to leave consumers vulnerable to misinformation. The challenge lies in crafting policies that safeguard consumers while preserving their access to the comprehensive information necessary for informed decision-making. For those accused of being conspiracy theorists over the last decade, the success of their predictions as opposed to the statements by bureaucrats and government officials leaves the latter looking incredulous and corrupt.

The importance of consumer knowledge cannot be overstated in the context of a free-market economy. While there is a role for the government in protecting consumers, there is also a danger that overregulation can reduce consumer knowledge, leading to poorer consumer choices and less efficient markets. The examples from Australia serve as a cautionary tale of the unintended consequences of such interventions. As a society, we must remain vigilant against the encroachment on information access, ensuring that consumer knowledge remains a pillar of market freedom and efficiency. There has been no bigger killer of Australian people in any war or foreign action compared to the policies of the government and their bureaucrats at home. Critical thinking and healthy skepticism are always warranted. From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

6 views0 comments


bottom of page