top of page

The Importance of Providing Equal Access to Justice for All Community Members

In a society constantly evolving and facing diverse challenges, the notion of justice stands as a bedrock principle. Its application and accessibility, however, often present a complex mosaic of issues that require a nuanced understanding. This discourse aims to explore the importance of providing equal access to justice for all community members.

Justice, in its ideal form, is impartial and blind to differences, serving as an arbiter that stands above social, economic, and personal disparities. However, reality in the Northern Territory often deviates from this ideal. The complexity of legal systems, coupled with socioeconomic inequalities, and very real racial bias and bigotry, often results in a justice system that is more accessible to some than to others.

Economic disparities play a significant role in access to justice. In Australia, for example, the cost of legal representation can be prohibitive. This financial barrier often leaves the economically disadvantaged in a precarious position where they either forego legal representation or resort to less experienced or overburdened legal aid defenders.

Moreover, social barriers, such as language difficulties and cultural misunderstandings, further complicate access. Indigenous Australians, for instance, have often faced systemic challenges in the justice system, stemming from both historical and contemporary prejudices and misunderstandings. So in the Northern Territory hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on an Aboriginal legal aid service, which has seen a predominant disparity in representation provided to people based on colour, and culture.

The psychological impact of navigating the justice system cannot be understated. Individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds often experience a sense of alienation and mistrust towards legal institutions. This psychological barrier, which is a result of prior experiences and societal narratives, widens the gap in access to justice. For instance the juvenile that has had multiple attendances to the courts due to his families chosen culture and belief systems, is treated with greater care than the first offender from a more privileged background. Social discrimination based on profiling and a belief that disadvantage is the primary reason for offending. This negates may of the psychological realities of criminal behaviour.

In the realm of criminal justice, the disparity in access to legal resources often results in a cycle of disadvantage. For example, young individuals from marginalized communities, lacking proper legal counsel, may find themselves ensnared in the criminal system for minor offenses, which could have been mitigated with adequate representation. Ax we have seen quite often in the NT the colour of the offender and the culture they come from is a major predeterminant for bailing young offenders.

This cycle not only affects the individuals involved but also has broader social implications. It undermines the public's trust in the legal system and perpetuates a view of justice as a privilege rather than a right. Which is an overwhelming belief in the Northern Territory.

Australia provides a pertinent context to examine these issues. Despite its robust legal framework, there are glaring disparities in how justice is accessed and administered. The case of Indigenous Australians is particularly illustrative. They are significantly overrepresented in the criminal justice system, a fact that points to deeper issues of culture, behavior, and social marginalization.

Moreover, recent inquiries and reports on wrongful convictions and police misconduct highlighted an urgent need for reforms to ensure that justice is equally accessible and administered. However, they left these reforms in the hands of lawyers and judges, those financially incentivised by the failure of the criminal justice system, with obvious results. Rather than reform behavior, they have punished the victims and rewarded bad behaviour, that has led to a massive explosion in juvenile property and violent crimes, including murders.

Addressing these disparities requires a sober and honest approach. On the legal front, increasing funding for legal aid services and ensuring that defenders are adequately resourced is critical. Additionally, there is a need for legal reforms to simplify processes and make them more accessible to non-experts. Including the implementation of victim advocates to ensure criminals are held accountable for their crimes.

Beyond legal reforms, there is a need for broader societal and cultural shifts. Education and awareness programs may play a crucial role in demystifying the legal system and making it more approachable. However, in the NT it is clearly still one rule for thee, and another for me.

Furthermore, there is a need for a more direct approach that considers the socioeconomic factors that often precede legal issues. Policies aimed at alleviating poverty, improving education, and fostering social inclusion indirectly contribute to more equitable access to justice. This can only be motivated by economic means. Turn off the tap for welfare funding, and this motivates people to do the right thing.

The pursuit of a just society is an ongoing endeavour, one that requires constant vigilance and adaptation. Ensuring equal access to justice is not merely a legal imperative but a fundamental aspect of a fair society. It is crucial to keep in mind that a legal system's strength is not only determined by its laws and regulations but also by how accessible and equitable it is to all members of society as Australia, along with other countries, struggles with these issues.

If a person receives greater advantage based on their colour or culture than merit, they breach the fundamental requirement of a just society. However, in the NT, where much of the discrimination is systemic, imposed by apartheid principles of elite stewardship of the lesser beings by the anointed, it is obvious that reforms must be both political as well as legal. From the author.

The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.

8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page