Australia’s political landscape is mischaracterized as offering a spectrum of ideological diversity. Upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that genuine conservatism, a philosophy emphasising limited government, individual liberty, and personal responsibility, has been systematically eroded. The two major parties, traditionally seen as political rivals, share a commitment to government expansionism, leaving no room for the classical conservative ideals that once defined Australia’s political ethos. Meanwhile, minor parties like the Greens and Teals push for policies that further centralise control, undermining private property rights and individual freedoms.
Conservatism in Australia has traditionally been associated with the values of self-reliance, small government, and free enterprise. However, a bipartisan commitment to government interventionism has steadily supplanted these principles. Both major parties, portrayed as ideological opposites, compete to expand public spending, regulate industries, and centralise power. This convergence has created a political mirage, where voters are presented with a choice that is, in reality, no choice at all.
The erosion of conservative principles is particularly evident in fiscal policy. Both major parties prioritise government-led solutions to economic challenges, whether through subsidies, infrastructure projects, or direct intervention in markets. This approach, while politically expedient, fosters dependency and discourages the entrepreneurial spirit that drives genuine economic growth.
Minor parties like the Greens and Teals exacerbate this trend by advocating for policies that prioritise environmental and social agendas over individual rights and economic freedoms. While these policies are framed as progressive and necessary for addressing contemporary challenges, their implementation typically involves heightened regulation, censorship, and increased government oversight.
The Greens’ push for stricter environmental regulations disregards the economic realities faced by industries and communities, particularly in resource-dependent regions like the Northern Territory. Similarly, the Teals’ focus on identity politics and climate action frequently translates into policies that undermine private property rights and limit personal agency. These parties effectively act as accelerants to the already expansive role of government, leaving little room for alternative viewpoints grounded in conservatism.
If you want to identify the motivations of an individual, follow the money, and the Teals are almost entirely driven by NGO's, intergovernmental agency employees, and activist advocates of one social agenda or another. They represent the extremes in parasitic exploitation of the community, not the solution to it.
The Northern Territory provides a stark example of how overregulation, driven by a lack of conservative principles, stifles economic development and personal autonomy.Federal and state-level bureaucracies have a significant influence on land use policies in the Territory, which leads to lengthy approval procedures that discourage investment and innovation.
Consider the challenges faced by landowners and developers in the Northern Territory. Securing approvals for new projects involves navigating a labyrinth of regulations, many of which are poorly aligned with local needs. This overregulation not only delays projects but also inflates costs, making it difficult for small businesses and local entrepreneurs to compete. In some cases, these barriers effectively lock landowners out of their own property, as government mandates dictate how land can and cannot be used.
The consequences of these policies are far-reaching. Overregulation stifles economic growth, limits job creation, and perpetuates dependency on government assistance. Communities that might otherwise thrive through private enterprise are instead left waiting for government-led solutions that rarely materialise or meet their needs.
The absence of conservatism in Australia’s political system has led to an overreliance on government intervention, which carries significant hidden costs. These include:
Economic Inefficiency: Government-led initiatives are plagued by inefficiencies, as resources are allocated based on political priorities rather than market demands.
Erosion of Individual Responsibility: As government assumes greater control over economic and social outcomes, individuals are disincentivized from taking personal responsibility for their lives and communities.
Loss of Autonomy: Overregulation and centralised control leave little room for local solutions, effectively disenfranchising communities and limiting their ability to address unique challenges.
Restoring a conservative balance to Australia’s political system requires a fundamental shift in how governance is approached. The following steps provide my proposed roadmap for reducing government intervention and fostering a culture of individual empowerment:
Streamlining Approval Processes - Governments must simplify the regulatory environment, particularly for land use and development. In the Northern Territory, this could involve consolidating approval processes, reducing redundant requirements, and establishing clear timelines for decisions. These changes would encourage investment, create jobs, and empower landowners to use their property as they see fit. This requires the removal of many ACTs and regulations, not greater employment of leeching parasitic bureaucrats disincentivized to fix the problems. Or worse, shareholders, industry lobbyists, and corrupt nepotism, which the NT Government has a long history of.
Incentivizing Private Development - Private enterprise should be encouraged to take the lead in addressing economic and social challenges. Governments can support this by offering tax incentives and reducing compliance costs. In the Northern Territory, such initiatives will revitalise industries like tourism, agriculture, and renewable energy.
Decentralising Decision-Making - Decision-making authority should be shifted from federal and state governments to local communities. This approach would ensure that policies are tailored to the specific needs of the regions they affect, rather than being imposed from above. In the Northern Territory, greater personal autonomy and accountability for local councils and Indigenous communities could lead to more effective and sustainable solutions.
Promoting a Culture of Self-Reliance - Policymakers should prioritise initiatives that encourage self-reliance and personal responsibility. This could include educational programs that teach financial literacy, vocational training to equip individuals with in-demand skills, and social policies that reward effort and initiative.
Advocating for Political Diversity - Australia’s political system must make room for voices that challenge the status quo of government expansionism. This could involve electoral reforms to support minor parties and independent candidates who espouse genuine conservative principles.The removal of funding restrictions on independents compared to parties is one immediate change that would remove perceived bias and corruption.
In Australia's political system, which is characterised by government expansionism, the conservative values of limited government, individual responsibility, and economic freedom have little room.
The Northern Territory’s struggles with overregulation and dependency illustrate the broader consequences of this system. However, by streamlining approval processes, incentivizing private development, decentralising decision-making, and promoting self-reliance, it is possible to restore a balance that prioritises individual empowerment and economic vitality.
The path forward requires courage, decency, principles, and conviction, values that have always been at the heart of conservatism. By reclaiming these principles, Australia can chart a course towards a future defined not by dependence and control, but by freedom and opportunity. From the author.
The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.
Comments